The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles 23:38, 20 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Official and Unofficial Club World Champions (Football): the Timeline[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unreferenced, original research based on very subjective assessment of what constitutues an unofficial world championship match. NtheP (talk) 18:47, 13 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. ChrisTheDude (talk) 20:30, 13 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Its not impossible for this type of thing to gain enough media coverage to have an article (the unrelated Unofficial Football World Championship for example) but there is no evidence that this is anything other than original research. Oldelpaso (talk) 20:34, 13 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. WP:OR. No evidence of notability. Argyle 4 Life^talk 22:38, 13 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as original research. Giant Snowman 23:18, 13 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. — frankie (talk) 20:18, 14 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per all above. – Pee Jay 13:25, 16 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.