The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 21:44, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Omar Benson Miller[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A minor-bit actor. Almost no sources at all, and a frequent target of misinformation. Hipocrite (talk) 01:34, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:22, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per career meeting WP:ENT [1] and coverage meeting WP:GNG. Its time to use the available sources to expand and improve the article. Surmountable issues are a reason to keep an article, not delete it. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 21:16, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget 00:37, 14 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 07:04, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - agree with Mr. Schmidt above. The actor has achieved notability with prominent role on notable series. Needing expansion and improvement is not a good reason for an AfD. That's what stub tags and edit tags are for. DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 16:54, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.