The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --Core desat 04:39, 2 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

One Block[edit]

Apparently a hoax: the IMDB listing for the director (a former member of N.W.A. who is unlikely to make a short film about a Chihuahua) reveals no such film and there's no IMDB listing for the dog, also no references/citations and thus fails WP:Notable/WP:Verifiable. Accounting4Taste 01:46, 28 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I am also nominating the following related page because there's no verifiable sources listed for Fifi (dog), who is said to be two years of age but made a film in 2001:

Fifi (dog) Accounting4Taste 01:51, 28 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I am also nominating the following related page about a movie putatively to be made featuring the dog because it refers to a projected movie for 2009 that doesn't meet WP:NOT#CRYSTAL or WP:MOVIE:

Hey Fifi! Accounting4Taste 01:54, 28 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

And the following industrious but futile redirects: Fifi Dogg, Se Fifi, Pelele Fifi, Sexy Fifi, Le Fifi. Accounting4Taste 19:55, 28 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete all, failure of WP:V. Nothing found in Google News Archive even slightly resembling sources. --Dhartung | Talk 04:19, 28 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all Most likely a hoax. The lack of reliable sources for this article is also a major concern here. It also fails WP:V as well. --S iva1979^{Talk to me} 07:00, 28 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.