The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. ck lostsword•T•C 17:15, 7 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

OpenDBA[edit]

OpenDBA (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Orphan, no explanation of why this software product is notable, no reliable third-party sources are given that refer to this product. —Bkell (talk) 22:01, 1 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Does not meet criteria for notability. No significant coverage of the product, no sources (independent or otherwise) given (therefore no reliable sources). Tdmg 02:25, 6 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 13:33, 5 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete orphaned, nn ¿SFGiДnts! ^{¿Complain! ¿Analyze! ¿Review!} 21:05, 6 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.