The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was DELETE. postdlf (talk) 15:14, 21 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

OpenLuna[edit]

OpenLuna (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I am finding it very hard to prevent myself from calling this a lunatic idea. A private enterprise mission to put people on the moon. The question of course is not whether it will ever succeed but whether, at this time, it is notable. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 13:03, 14 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. I can't find any coverage in reliable sources, so no, it appears not to be notable.--Michig (talk) 13:15, 14 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. No independent coverage, put up by a user with a COI and mostly consists of cut/paste text from the place's website. Kevin (talk) 20:11, 14 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 20:53, 15 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Insufficient coverage in reliable sources. We might revisit this if they move forward, or if they get more coverage - though I'm forced to agree that this is unlikely. UltraExactZZ ^Said ~ Did 12:41, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.