- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. Michig (talk) 06:52, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Oranum (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable, fails WP:NWEB JMHamo (talk) 00:14, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. GabeIglesia (talk) 00:23, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, "Web content is not notable merely because a notable person, business, or event was associated with it." GABHello! 02:09, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as searches are not finding better. SwisterTwister talk 04:47, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, no notability whatsoever. --Laber□T 15:42, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:21, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Paranormal-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:21, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.