The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 13:05, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orderliness[edit]

Orderliness (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Appears to be WP:OR; other sources might exist using the word "orderliness", but any such article would likely be WP:SYNTH. Searching for sources is difficult as it simply produces dictionary definitions, but there's no sign that a unified topic exists. YorkshireLad  ✿  ^(talk) 12:16, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Psychology-related deletion discussions. YorkshireLad  ✿  ^(talk) 12:16, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom, and the fact that it contains the sentence "Orderliness could mean being considerate at events and functions, due to a desire for symmetry." -Roxy the dog 09:12, 2 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.