The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) ansh 666 23:29, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Organ crawl[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I don't believe that this term is notable. Perhaps it is something for WikiDictionary Gbawden (talk) 08:27, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:46, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger _{One ping only} 07:54, 23 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The topic is notable. For example, it is interesting to find that Mendelssohn took his bride on an organ crawl when they were on honeymoon. Andrew D. (talk) 17:18, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —UY Scuti ^Talk 19:01, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep – A notable topic that meets WP:GNG: [1] (subscription required), [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9] (subscription required), [10] (subscription required), more.... As such, should be expanded accordingly. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 13:39, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 13:46, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 13:46, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. As the other editors in this discussion have demonstrated, there are plenty of sources that substantiate notability. -- Notecardforfree (talk) 18:29, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.