The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 18:19, 28 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Otherearth[edit]

Otherearth (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Fails WP:NOTE, WP:V, WP:REF, WP:CRYSTAL: non-notable (and unreleased) game with no references from reliable, third-party published sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy. Wyatt Riot (talk) 18:24, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. MrKIA11 (talk) 22:56, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. WP:CRYSTAL. Niteshift36 (talk) 08:32, 22 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. WP:CRYSTAL. User:Swatcat (talk) 10:58, 22 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Per what of WP: CRYSTAL? -- Jelly Soup (talk) 02:00, 23 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - Wikipedia is not a project homepage: "Here are a couple of images of the 3D models being created by our very talented modelling team." Delete on grounds of notability, verifiability and neutrality. Marasmusine (talk) 13:54, 22 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. WP:Advertising for a future release, with no WP:notability or WP:reliable sources. It's not notable yet, and would need a critical rewrite. Most information is not released yet and has been entered by an insider. By that logic, the entire thing would have to be gutted if kept. Greg Tyler ^{(t • c)} 22:34, 22 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.