The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Primefac (talk) 02:11, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ouk Sovann[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested PROD. Concern was Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG. He has not played in a fully pro league and his one appearance for Cambodia was not a Tier 1 match, meaning the article also fails WP:NSPORT. PROD was contested by an IP without providing a reason. Sir Sputnik (talk) 00:09, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Sir Sputnik (talk) 00:10, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Sir Sputnik (talk) 00:10, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Cambodia-related deletion discussions. Sir Sputnik (talk) 00:10, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Hhhhhkohhhhh (talk) 08:46, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note to voter Please doing a search before sharing your opinion, thanks. Hhhhhkohhhhh (talk) 08:46, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Fails WP:NFOOTY. NZFC^(talk) 11:56, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. Giant Snowman 16:29, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Fails NFOOTY as has not played or managed senior international football nor played or managed in a fully professional league. No indication that subject has garnered significant reliable coverage for any other achievements to satisfy GNG. Claim in article to two senior caps is incorrect, one match was not a full FIFA 'A' International ands in the other he was an unused substitute. Fenix down (talk) 13:37, 16 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.