The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Article fulfills its purpose per WP:WPOUTLINE, which makes me feel confident that this can be closed as a speedy keep per discussion. One (talk) 14:25, 11 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Outline of South Africa[edit]

Outline of South Africa (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

I do not really see the point of this article: it is incomplete (check the general reference section) and is just a bunch of redlinks or links that should be elsewhere (do they have to have all the municipalities presented there - they would be better in a navbox). ChrisDHDR 12:03, 11 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment It may be part of WP:WPOUTLINE. Drawn Some (talk) 12:10, 11 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy keep - This is an outline, and it is fulfilling its purpose as an outline. Also, the article is not "just a bunch of redlinks", I see a majority of blue links. And your assertion that all the links should be elsewhere is false, this is an outline, and while the links can be in a navbox, they should be here too. The purpose of an outline is to provide easy navigability between items in a topic. Cheers! Scapler (talk) 12:42, 11 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy keep - Valid article as per WP:WPOUTLINE, just need some work --NJR_ZA (talk) 12:44, 11 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.