- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy keep. Consensus is clear on this nomination being potentially WP:SNOW. Alex Shih (talk) 19:42, 15 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Outposts: Journeys to the Surviving Relics of the British Empire (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable book Amisom (talk) 19:05, 13 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 19:24, 13 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 19:24, 13 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep and rename to the name of the 1987 edition, The Sun Never Sets: Travels to the Remaining Outposts of the British Empire, which was widely reviewed in the major newspapers. See the Washington Post review. StarryGrandma (talk) 01:09, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep As it was originally released in the pre-internet era reviews from that time are going to be harder to find. StarryGrandma has found an excellent source from the Washington Post which helps confirm notability per WP:NBOOK. AusLondonder (talk) 04:50, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, meets WP:GNG and WP:NBOOK, in addition to the Washington Post review, there is a review in the The Christian Science Monitor - here, and a couple of short "trade reviews": Publishers Weekly here, and Library Journal here. also agree that article should be renamed to the 1st edition title. Coolabahapple (talk) 01:33, 15 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - WP:GNG and WP:NBOOK are met with evidence of reviews, plus Google Scholar suggests the reprinted title at least is cited at least 62 times in other academic works. Google Books also shows this work is referred to and used as a reference in many other works. 82.39.49.182 (talk) 08:57, 15 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.