The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete housekeeping non-admin closure: A7 (not listed in log) czar · · 17:53, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Owen Thomas (boxer)[edit]

Owen Thomas (boxer) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article is probably a sandbox experiment by a new editor. The article is not suitable for Wikipedia; no information and the person in question on which the article is based is not noteworthy. Ahmer Jamil Khan (talk) 16:19, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Speedy delete Tagged it. Peridon (talk) 16:45, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. czar · · 16:48, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. czar · · 16:48, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Speedy delete A7: makes no effort to assert notability. Also no hits for a living boxer by this name. czar · · 16:56, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy delete per A7: Clear cut case for speedy deletion. Ahmer Jamil Khan, you do know about speedy deletion, right? If not, you should read Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion, because this should have been tagged for speedy deletion, and no AFD discussion should have been created. Lugia2453 (talk) 17:06, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.