The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge‎ to Neom. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 23:02, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oxagon[edit]

Oxagon (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is the fourth of four articles about parts of NEOM, a grandiose Saudi commercial, industrial, and recreational development:

This article is about a floating industrial complex on the Saudi shore of the Red Sea. However, the article does not speak for itself and does not provide any indication that the complex, which is still under construction is notable, because they do not describe what third parties have said. A review of the references was needed. None of the references are independent; they are in the nature of press releases:

Reference Number Reference Comments Independent Significant Reliable Secondary
1 www.spa.gov.sa, Saudi Press Agency Announcement of plans for Oxagon No Yes Yes No
2 www.neom.com Information brochure about Oxagon No Yes Yes No
3 www.arabnews.com Press release from prince about Oxagon No Yes Yes No
4 saudigazette.com.sa Press release about a subsidiary company located at Oxagon No Not significantly about Oxagon because about Tonomus Yes No
5 www.gccbusinessnews.com Access to web site blocked by malware protection Probably not Unknown No Probably not

Robert McClenon (talk) 21:06, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Draftify. The creator of the article moved it from drafts to mainspace on his own, but clearly rushed it. Suitskvarts (talk) 14:58, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 23:54, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting to get more opinions. It would be useful to see what the nominator thinks of ATD mentioned in the discussion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 22:02, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.