The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 20:09, 23 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

PCDitch[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is non-notable modelling software. The refs in the article aren't sufficient for this to pass GNG and while there are offline refs I have little doubt they are of a similar vein. Before showing nothing exept wp mirrors and few scientific journals. Created by a single purpose account, tagged advert since 2015, the talk page has never been created. Desertarun (talk) 16:12, 15 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:27, 15 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:27, 15 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: No reliable sources, no evidence of notability. Non Notable Software. TheDreamBoat (talk) 00:36, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.