The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Strong argument to keep by Git2012. v/r - TP 20:30, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

PDXLAN[edit]

PDXLAN (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not seem to meet WP:EVENT, specifically WP:INDEPTH. Article lists approximate number of participants as 550. Article also includes significant amount of non-encyclopedic information. --Non-Dropframe talk 01:50, 2 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:55, 2 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Oregon-related deletion discussions. Valfontis (talk) 18:28, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Tom Morris (talk) 12:13, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Black Kite (talk) 00:12, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.