- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 23:22, 26 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Pakistan Aeronautical Complex PF-X[edit]
- Pakistan Aeronautical Complex PF-X (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
"Article strictly relies on a primary and another unreliable third party source, mostly WP:OR. The stub is too short due to lack of coverage and details among reliable sources to even have a section in PAC, leave alone having a standalone article. Swift deletion requested. Aman Kumar Goel (Talk) 13:01, 19 November 2022 (UTC)"[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 19:49, 26 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- delete It's hard to get a good grip on this article, if for no other reason that the mention of Project Azm leads to a sentence stating that the project was cancelled. This is the sort of thing that led to WP:CRYSTAL. Mangoe (talk) 21:18, 26 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.