The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 06:13, 30 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Palesrael and Israel-Palestine[edit]

Delete Both Two article for alterna-terms prodded by me with the same notice, to wit, "neologism, rarely if ever used, POV magnet, nothing to merge". As far as I can tell, these are not accepted terms anywhere, invented words that the BBC does not use. I think this may be what they term here "POV-fork". Prods were removed on both article without an objection to deletion, just a desire for discussion. - CrazyRussian talk/contribs/email 06:17, 25 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete apparent protologisms Just zis Guy you know? 10:13, 25 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per jzg M1ss1ontomars2k4 14:19, 25 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, POV fork, protologism. --Terence Ong 14:20, 25 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Abstain, can't decide. I may change this if someone comes up with a good case to keep. —Ashley Y 17:17, 25 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per WP:NEO.--Isotope23 17:36, 25 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete neologism --Bachrach44 19:54, 25 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Neologism. Jayjg ^(talk) 23:18, 26 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. per norm -- - K a s h ^{Talk | email} 14:22, 29 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - per above. —Khoikhoi 22:55, 29 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.