The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. MBisanz ^talk 04:37, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Patola (1988 film)[edit]

Patola (1988 film) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article was proposed for deletion, but was deproded with the comment that notable actors are present. Nominating this for deletion as the article does not list any WP:RS and fails WP:NFILM. Presence of notable actors does not make the subject notable as notability is not inherited. Hagennos^Talk 17:34, 26 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Hagennos^Talk 17:35, 26 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Hagennos^Talk 17:35, 26 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete--per nom.Nothing in offline sources.For the record, the de-prodding by Necrothesp was good and rational enough.~ Winged Blades^Godric 12:14, 14 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. It has always been generally accepted that films that star notable actors are themselves notable. Frankly, if this was a British or American film keeping would have been a done deal. -- Necrothesp (talk) 13:36, 14 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.