The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Delete. Sources are inadequate to establish notability. Very little coverage availbale that is in depth and independent. Much of the article lacks sources. Looks like a promo piece.198.58.170.90 (talk) 05:08, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Per nomination. He isn't notable yet; maybe some time in the future if his work to come gets adequate attention. ——Chalk19 (talk) 17:26, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.