The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy Delete A7. Speedy or no, consensus below seems pretty clear on the matter. UltraExactZZ ^Said ~ Did 15:44, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Paturin-suku[edit]

Paturin-suku (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is an unreferenced genealogy tree, with no connection to articles that I can see. PROD removed by article creator. ArglebargleIV (talk) 20:53, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - Per WP:NOT, article would only assist in creating a 'genealogical overload', because the majority of these individuals (if any) don't merit articles on their own. SaveATreeEatAVegan 21:11, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Who are these people, and why are they here? No indication, or even claim, of notability. Borderline speedy. •••Life of Riley (T–C) 02:15, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:40, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Snow this NN list, wholly unreferenced, as soon as possible please. Trout the article creator if he appears here. Waste of time. --Epeefleche (talk) 03:33, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - The article seems to be original research. Not finding coverage in reliable sources for "Paturin-suku", "Paturin-suku genealogy" or "Paturin-suku family". Appears to fail WP:GNG. Northamerica1000^(talk) 20:07, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: unreferenced without evidence or assertion of notability, not even in English. Any reason why this cannot go on WP:CSD A7? AllyD (talk) 18:12, 19 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy delete: per WP:CSD A7. No indication of notability and a search turns up nothing. --> Gggh ^talk/_contribs 22:54, 19 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment. See also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tyven-suku—same author and apparently a related family. 04:44, 21 February 2012 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.