The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep (non-admin closure). Sir Sputnik (talk) 17:19, 5 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Paul Newe[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested PROD. Has not played in a Fully Pro League, so fails WP:NFOOTBALL and also WP:GNG JMHamo (talk) 17:54, 26 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. JMHamo (talk) 17:55, 26 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ireland-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:55, 26 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:55, 26 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:55, 26 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. The claim of over 100 League goals is quite an achievement, and one that cold indicate notability, but that is unreferenced. If further sourcing/coverage can be found to show notability please ping me. Giant Snowman 18:39, 26 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep - probably notable given his goal-scoring achievements. I'm willing to err on the side of notability. Can always be brought back to AFD in due course if GNG cannot be proved, but for now the assumption is sufficient. Giant Snowman 18:49, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep - @GiantSnowman: the article now has a reference to RSSSF supporting the claim for >100 goals. For me this would indicate that there is almost certainly significant coverage about this player, as he is one of only 42 players as of the end of 2012 to have ever achieved this. Would like to see more added though to further support GNG. Fenix down (talk) 09:11, 28 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.