The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. v/r - T P 17:02, 19 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Pedro Marangoni

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The tagged banner at the top complete's the summary of what is wrong with the page. You can clearly see the user has tried to put an infobox but failed to clearly define the infobox correctly. In my opinion I do not think the user intends to add much more to the article or even clean it up to meet Wikipedia's requirements. Adamdaley (talk) 23:50, 11 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:26, 12 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:27, 12 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No opinion on the keeping or deleting of this article on the grounds of being a poorly cited biography of a living person (which is what I think the ((multiple issues)) tag on the page is trying to imply, among other problems), but "inexperienced user failing to completely and correctly implement a relatively complex piece of markup language" is a strange reason to call for the deletion of an article, as is making assumptions about the aforementioned inexperienced user's (who I've only just ((welcome))d and informed of this discussion) intentions and understanding of Wikipedia policy and guidelines. -- saberwyn 05:08, 12 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Agree with the comments of saberwyn above. Inexperienced user may also not have had English as a first language. However, having had a dig through, I don't see sufficiently notability under the criteria set out in WP:AUTHOR. But appreciate that English language sources may be limited - anyone who is fluent in Portugese want to chip in? --Legis (talk - contribs) 08:48, 12 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, fails WP:AUHTOR. -- P 1 9 9 • TALK 15:35, 19 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.