The result was KEEP. postdlf (talk) 02:05, 6 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Being a Playboy playmate does not make you notable. Being chosen Playmate of the Month or Playmate of the Year is not an award: It's a strategic commercial decision made by Playboy Corporation about how to better commercialize it products. Regardless of how much some Wikipedians love Playmates, we should write articles about them only when they were covered by independent third part sources. Also, texts solely related to their playmatehood are not the kind non-trivial coverage asked by the general notability criteria. Damiens.rf 02:18, 28 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Plenty of coverage to pass GNG. [1] Nominator is confusing trivial as in depth of coverage with importance of the subject. Morbidthoughts (talk) 15:20, 3 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as per ever-reliable Hullaballoo Wolfowitz. --82.41.20.82 (talk) 19:44, 3 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]