- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy keep. Withdrawn; apparently Google search didn't include CECV in results. (non-admin closure) power~enwiki (π, ν) 18:13, 17 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Penultima (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No notability for this chess variant; the only reference is a newsletter of the Variant Chess society. I found a few message boards where people tried to play this, but nothing that establishes notability. power~enwiki (π, ν) 03:05, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. ~Ruyaba~ {talk} 04:16, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. ~Ruyaba~ {talk} 04:16, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. It has a paragraph in the CECV, §38.11 Games in which the players have different roles: Pritchard, D. B. (2007). "Penultima". In Beasley, John (ed.). The Classified Encyclopedia of Chess Variants. John Beasley. p. 354. ISBN 978-0-9555168-0-1. --IHTS (talk) 04:59, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. We now have two sources in the article. The Classified Encyclopedia of Chess Variants is presumably a reliable source, but not accessible online. Variant Chess describes itself as the Journal of the British Chess Variant Society, not a newsletter as stated in the nom, and is set out that way. It may not be scholarly peer reviewed, but it seems to meet our usual criteria for news sources; it has an editorial board, articles are from named writers, and it does not accept paid content. The article in question is in-depth (two pages) and shows that the variant is (or was) actively played, rather than just made up by someone as an interesting exercise. I also found two brief entries in book sources: UNBORED Games and Tabletop Game Design for Video Game Designers. That seems enough to me to get it past the WP:N. SpinningSpark 09:26, 17 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.