The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. \ Backslash Forwardslash / (talk) 08:18, 4 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Performance of teams in 2009-10 UEFA competitions, grouped by country[edit]

Performance of teams in 2009-10 UEFA competitions, grouped by country (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article consists, in equal parts, of original research and sports-almanac content. PROD was contested. Stifle (talk) 14:46, 28 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football related deletions. ChrisTheDude (talk) 15:05, 28 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete completely agree with nominator, this is definitely what Wikipedia is not. --Angelo (talk) 15:12, 28 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to know why it is considered "original research", when all the info on this page is based on matches that have already been played! Do you just want me to clog the page with a link on every row to UEFA's website as proof that none of what I've put is lies? I admit that in the past I was making presumptive edits (i.e. putting a team as eliminated if they lost the first leg 6-0 at home or something) but I have stopped that and shall do it no more as it doesn't help anyone obviously.

Please don't take me as someone who likes to cause trouble. The only reason I created this page is because there is no other page like it on WP, that is to say one through which you can quickly find out how all the teams of a particular country are doing in the two UEFA competitions. I honestly thought I was doing something (at least slightly) useful but I know better than to waste any more time fighting an admin so it looks like I'll be continuing this table on my own webspace. Never mind, it was worth a try! --SirJibby (talk) 15:17, 28 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Above moved from the talk page of this AfD, where it had been placed in error -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 15:29, 28 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - This is certainly not encyclopaedic content. – PeeJay 19:22, 28 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - This is an encyclopaedia. The individual competition articles and club articles already cover all this. Spiderone 08:43, 29 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. -- Cybercobra (talk) 04:12, 30 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - not encyclopaedic. GiantSnowman 17:03, 31 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - Per Spiderone. Hubschrauber729 (talk) 21:51, 31 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.