- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Nomination withdrawn given notability claim by JCJC777. (non-admin closure) Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 23:01, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Peter Harvey (Buddhism) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The article claims that Harvey meets WP:NACADEMICS criterion 4. I was unable to verify that these textbooks had the impact claimed and much of the current sourcing on the page is poor (e.g. citing a preface as a source for book sales). I will happily withdraw if credible sourcing can be found for that (or other) notability criterion. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 21:38, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- stimulated to start an article as Harvey is so extensively used as a source in the anatta article. If this article deleted then probably right to have less emphasis on Harvey in the anatta article.
JCJC777
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.