The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ƙɽɨɱρᶓȶ 07:38, 30 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Philip Buble[edit]

Serious WP:BLP concerns. Article is about a single highly embarassing incident in a living person's life - unlikely to ever have more material let alone become a valid biographical article. The details are really just titillation and Wikipedia is an encyclopedia not a tabloid newspaper... WjBscribe 02:12, 28 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete - major BLP nightmare. Totally NN individual. Non-encyclopedic - Alison ☺ 02:13, 28 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete for mostly the same reasons as Alison. If his issue turns into a Supreme Court case, we'll talk, but for now there's no reason that it should even have hung around this long. Trusilver 02:20, 28 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I didnt think this could be real, but it is!. However, sleeping with one's dog does not make one notable Corpx 04:37, 28 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, notability only in a constituency's minds. --Dhartung | Talk 05:38, 28 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Strong delete: Come on?! This is 2 things: 1) A major BLP vio as Alison stated, and 2) Major nonsense. —« ANIMUM » 14:41, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 02:25, 30 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 02:25, 30 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.