The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep—users have shown that notability exists. — Deckiller 13:51, 9 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

PhpWebSite[edit]

PhpWebSite (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

expired uncontested prod, but this article has been around awhile with many editors so it should be afd'ed not prod'ed. Prod tag was WP:N ans WP:SPAM, which about sums up what the article is. Several similar articles will shortly be nominated, but rather than all-at-once, which tends to get us nowhere, they'll be separate, so whether you're feelings are the same or different on each, please note that so that the closing admin can figure out consensus more easily. Carlossuarez46 23:56, 3 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletions. -- KTC 03:28, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak Keep - this coverage gives it notability Corpx 05:14, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete For the same reasons as those for which I proded it. Jackaranga 14:09, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per reliable source coverage [1] [2] [3] [4] JulesH 16:27, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.