The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles 00:03, 14 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Piet Boon

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Seems like self-promotion for a person who at best is questionably notable. Jason Quinn (talk) 02:43, 24 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. — I, Jethrobot ^{drop me a line} (note: not a bot!) 05:38, 24 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. — I, Jethrobot ^{drop me a line} (note: not a bot!) 05:39, 24 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:05, 31 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:30, 7 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Selfpromitional article with no notability. Lugnuts (talk) 08:41, 7 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Non notable architect. Eduemoni ^↑talk↓ 18:25, 7 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.