The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete --JForget 23:51, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Pigeon Poo (video game)[edit]

The article fails to meet the general notability guideline and all attempts to find reliable sources have failed. Just as a bit of background, this article has been proposed for deletion by a different editor before, but it was removed by the author, and no explanation (nor any other changes to the article) were given. Brian Reading (talk) 19:44, 14 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. —Brian Reading (talk) 19:48, 14 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Game-related deletion discussions. —Brian Reading (talk) 19:51, 14 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. No third-party coverage whatsoever and "non-usefulness" means it will have to go... SF007 (talk) 20:20, 14 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. Greg Tyler ^{(t • c)} 21:17, 14 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:02, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Looks like simply a run-of-the-mill iPhone game. Nothing notable.Tim Song (talk) 01:16, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Weak delete. Doesn't seem to quite pass WP:N, not to mention that the "story" section is lifted directly from the official website. THE AMERICAN METROSEXUAL 01:43, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Good catch on the possible copyvio. Appears to be another game and that's it. No notability found. --Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 01:45, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - non-notable software article created by single-issue user. Dialectric (talk) 12:15, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails WP:N due to the lack of coverage in reliable secondary sources, none coming from a search. It's great that bedroom programming has returned along with the small development team, but with thousands of iPhone/flash/browser games spilling onto the market only a handful will ever get enough coverage for an article on WP. Someone another 21:26, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.