The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Closing per obvious consensus. — Aitias // discussion 04:38, 26 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Pokemon Quartz[edit]

Contested prod. Hack with no assertion of notability. Delete. Blanchardb -^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}- timed 02:59, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Possibly speedy. Not notable. Malinaccier (talk) 03:20, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Hoax, no sources, not notable hack even if it does exist. TJ Spyke 03:27, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: No references provided, speedy delete. Newport Beach (talk) 05:02, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The haxxors are invading! Tavix (talk) 05:33, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. MuZemike (talk) 07:45, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Strong delete and probably not a hoax as it probably exists. Definitely not notable and not worthy of an article here for apparent reasons. MuZemike (talk) 07:48, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Scrape it against a porcelain plate until it is no-more.--Koji† 19:53, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
~~Speedy Delete (A7)~~ Strong Delete - I don't see an assertion of notability here... VX!^~~~ 20:21, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Delete Looks like a NN hack to me. Never asserts notability. Doc Strange^MailboxLogbook 21:06, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Delete - completely unencyclopedic Jason Quinn (talk) 21:55, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.