The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete per WP:SNOW. Stifle (talk) 14:12, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Pokemon biology[edit]

Pokemon biology (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Bizarre, in-universe or just plain weird ramblings about Pokemon. I tried several CSDs, but wasn't sure it met any of them, plus IPs removed them. Don't really know what to do with it, but I know it shouldn't stay. gnfnrf (talk) 04:58, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - it's in-universe or original research, or private musings, or something like that. - Richard Cavell (talk) 05:16, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Strong delete — Ugh. MuZemike (talk) 05:44, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy Delete Articles like this are why the academics can't stand us. Please, if you write an article, make sure more than a few people (aka not your friends or Pokemon chat room chums) care about it. Nate • (chatter) 06:25, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

General interest or disinterest are no reasons for keeping/deleting an article. ~ | twsx | ^talk_cont | ~ 12:33, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Speedy Delete Made up. Unpopular Opinion (talk · contribs) 08:31, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Appears to be original research expanded out of various Pokemon games. Although items like "protein" and "carbos" appear there, they are not listed as "nutrition". Sjakkalle (Check!) 08:44, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy Delete - Seriously? An entire article on fictional critters? :O Rilak (talk) 10:31, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per WP:FICT, element of fiction with no reliable independent source to establish notability outside of the Pokémon universe.--Boffob (talk) 13:00, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.