The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Poodle crossbreed. Sandstein 09:33, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Poochon[edit]

Poochon (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable dog crossbreed; sources are all atrocious and Google only seems to flip up kennel and scraper websites, a news story about one being stolen and passing mentions in "every dog breed ever in the world" books. TKK! bark with me! 01:26, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: Sources do not exhibit the breed's notability, fails WP:GNG. Toreightyone (talk) 01:54, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Animal-related deletion discussions. L3X1 (distænt write) 02:20, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Redirect to Poodle hybrids, this debate has happened before, and I doubt the outcome would be much different. Drewmutt (^ᴥ^) talk 05:45, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Redirect per previus outcomes. No need fro deltion when ATD-R allows for a redirect of a potentially useful search term. 13:25, 29 December 2017 (UTC) >SerialNumber54129^{...speculates}

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.