The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Per consensus  Philg88 ^♦talk 06:50, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Possible origins of the bicycle kick[edit]

Possible origins of the bicycle kick (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This page is at this point nothing more than a content fork of the main page at bicycle kick. It should be deleted. MarshalN20 ^Talk 09:19, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. ChrisTheDude (talk) 09:23, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. — Jkudlick ^tc_s 11:22, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - no need for a content fork, and smacks of OR. GiantSnowman 13:04, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - per nom. There is clearly no need for a separate article on this. Merge whatever content can be verified to bicycle kick assuming its not already there. Sir Sputnik (talk) 23:44, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - absolutely no need for a separate article. There doesn't appear to be much worth adding to the main article that isn't already there. Spiderone 18:59, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.