The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. No merge considering the circumstances (BLP) and the article poor shape. Secret ^account 03:10, 25 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Pragya Singh Thakur

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This person is just known for involvment in one trial, the person is just an accused and can be said that the person not much known apart from one incident, as per WP:CRIME A person who is known only in connection with a criminal event or trial should not normally be the subject of a separate Wikipedia article if there is an existing article that could incorporate the available encyclopedic material relating to that person. The details of the person can be incorporated in 29_September_2008_western_India_bombings#Malegaon_blasts sarvajna (talk) 15:43, 18 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Per note in wp:CRIME: "Note: A living person accused of a crime is presumed not guilty unless and until this is decided by a court of law. Editors must give serious consideration to not creating an article on an alleged perpetrator when no conviction is yet secured." (Emphasis in original) Yogesh Khandke (talk) 16:10, 18 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: The page/article not suitable as per the Wikipedia guidelines.Jussychoulex (talk) 16:57, 18 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:42, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:42, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Terrorism-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:42, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:42, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete — Per WP:BLPCRIME. Even if a conviction is secured, this article should probably be rewritten from scratch. JFHJr (㊟) 19:54, 21 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to 29_September_2008_western_India_bombings#Malegaon_blasts per WP:BLPCRIME. This person is still notable enough to have information to be retained in the article about the crime. Aurorion (talk) 14:49, 24 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.