The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. WP:SNOW. Indeed, it is non-notable and promotional. -- Ed (Edgar181) 14:48, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Prealism[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This doesn't appear to have had any independent coverage by third-party sources, and so appears to be a use of Wikipedia to promote original research or a new movement.

Portions of this appear to be copyvio. Have not had time to determine conclusively whether it is entirely copyvio.

No independent evidence of notability. Robert McClenon (talk) 02:14, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

See also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Secrets of the Artists. Robert McClenon (talk) 02:38, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

See also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/RUCS by the same author.--Fabrictramp | talk to me 02:54, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Can't find even unreliable sources about this concept. Part of a group of promotional COI articles to promote the author's book.--Fabrictramp | talk to me 02:57, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 03:25, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as per nom. Completely non notable and a WP:PROMOTION violation. - GretLomborg (talk) 05:45, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete – Blatant spam, and clearly non-notable. V2Blast (talk) 09:11, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Almost qualifies for WP:A11, the subject was invented/coined/discovered by the article's creator or someone they know personally, and does not credibly indicate why its subject is important or significant. It makes the claim, of course, but it is hardly credible. Mduvekot (talk) 10:35, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.