The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 21:36, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Princeton Reunions[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fandom with no real-notability. Fails WP:GNG. Störm (talk) 17:16, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 17:54, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 17:54, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New Jersey-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 17:54, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Merge / Redirect to Princeton University#Traditions There appears to be no standalone notability, but a highly condensed version should be merged into the Traditions section of the university article, with an accompanying redirect. Alansohn (talk) 19:04, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- "Fandom"? Anyway, this easily meets the GNG. Just see NYT and GQ and Princeton Magazine and Media Research Center and WSJ (sorry, paywall) and Washington Post. An extraordinary failure of WP:BEFORE. 192.160.216.52 (talk) 13:41, 12 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Here's one more to add to the list of reliable secondary sources: [1] The NY Times has at least half a dozen articles of varying length on the reunion. Adding a summary of this material to the Princeton University will just contribute to making it a WP:TOOLONG article. Fiachra10003 (talk) 02:13, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I added a critique of the 1967 P-rade from Edward Said's book Orientalism.E.M.Gregory (talk) 11:17, 14 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. The really major annual events of famous universities are appropriate for articles, and the references support that. DGG ( talk ) 02:12, 18 March 2018 (UTC) .[reply]
Keep but improving sourcing and referencing. As per the above !votes, there is RS about this topic, but it hasn't made its way into the article. Chetsford (talk) 18:53, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.