The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete as a recreation of an article previously deleted via AfD, both titles salted. Mjroots (talk) 06:00, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pritam Mhatre[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable politician. An opposition leader and a councillor in a municipal corporation does not meet our guidelines at WP:NPOL. No references found in a WP:BEFORE to indicate meeting notability. Jupitus Smart 17:21, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Jupitus Smart 17:21, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Jupitus Smart 17:21, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Does not meet WP:NPOL and not enough coverage for GNG. -- Ab207 (talk) 18:58, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment This page has been deleted multiple times link including via an Afd - Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pritam Janardan Mhatre. Jupitus Smart 10:42, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. If this page is deleted, then it needs to be salted due to the history detailed by Jupitus Smart above. None of the English-language sources help a whit for notability, being to a one sound bites/quotes. No comment on the non-English sources, except that two sources really is not enough to meet GNG and NPOL does not seem to have been satisfied. —A little blue Bori v^_^v ^{Jéské Couriano} 02:55, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I'm assuming OP is correct about BEFORE. We do want to avoid being anglosphere-centric, but I mean c'mon. You need to be at least a state-level legislator or equivilant, unless you have some other notability. Herostratus (talk) 03:11, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. No coverage to suggest WP:GNG or a criterion such as WP:NPOL is met. --Kinu ^t/_c 03:28, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment No comment on the notability of the subject, but the vandalism of the nominating editor's statement suggests bad faith on the part of the article creator. Funcrunch (talk) 03:32, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete under WP:CSD criteria G4. This has been deleted at a previous AfD as noted by User:Jupitus Smart. This appears to be a clear case of promotion by the article creator. After deletion, this and similarly named pages should be salted to avoid further abuse. Laplorfill (talk) 04:20, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete and salt. Extraordinary behaviour all round from the article creator, who took this AfD to ANI! Fails WP:GNG, likely UPE/COI in any case. (added speedy as per Laplorfill's salient contribution above.) Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 04:21, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.