The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e decker^talk 01:31, 17 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ProcessEdge[edit]

ProcessEdge (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable software product. Possibly mentioned in lists in google books but most references to ProcessEdge are to variables in computer programs. The only references on the page are from the company or its founder, so it seems like the article is merely self-promotion/spam. U2fanboi (talk) 14:45, 9 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Spam with no evidence of notability. —Swpb^talk 16:06, 9 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:09, 9 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:09, 9 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - Seems somewhat promo, Anyway can't find any evidence of any Notability. –Davey2010 • (talk) 22:47, 9 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.