The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Bucketsofg 03:17, 5 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Professional Wrestling Champions[edit]

Professional Wrestling Champions (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Repeated information that is listed on other, more appropriate pages. Wikipedia is not a website that blantly creates pages with lists on them. I don't know whether this is true, but would it fall under speedy-deletion?? Davnel03 20:53, 27 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep I want you to not delete this because I created it. Tj84
• Delete ye I agree with ya, all the information is on the belt pages anyway. Govvy 21:20, 27 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. --  oakster  TALK  21:52, 27 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep I find this to be very usefull information, it is much easier then looking up each federation seperatly. Kris Classic 00:53, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. WP:USEFUL is not a persuasive argument. Otto4711 02:05, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. --EazieCheeze 06:00, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. -- bulletproof ^3:16 06:40, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep It's an important article to have for fans of wrestling who wish to learn about current champions across all major brands. It would be a waste of time to go to 20+ pages for individual titles to see who current champions are. The article could/should be expanded with more information about current titles and their holders. --Hookedonlsd 16:28, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Or people could look at any of thousands of other sites that track pro wrestling titles. Otto4711 21:41, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• You could look at any one of the thousands of sites for a variety of topics covered by this site.--Hookedonlsd 21:09, 3 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. Normy132 07:10, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Total junk, we need articles to be as static as possible, and this never will be. Booshakla 10:22, 3 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - Fan cruft. Manager Of Champions 05:31, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.