The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. —Quarl ^(talk) 2007-03-14 10:51Z

Psygarden[edit]

Psygarden (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Article which appears to be written like and advertisement. The creator contested it, saying that it's not an ad, but it appears to be written very much like an advertisement.Hondasaregood 15:47, 9 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete It does read like a vanity article. I did tag it with {expand} and {unsourced} in the event anyone can come up with legitimate additions that moves it beyond the realm of non-notability. --Ozgod 15:55, 9 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Does not appear notable. NawlinWiki 16:26, 9 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete no indication of meeting WP:WEB and no sources. Nuttah68 19:59, 9 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Although this is not a speedy deletion it does read like an advertisment, failing WP:WEB.Aquasplash 21:19, 9 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Written in first person suggesting advertisement. Frickeg 01:17, 10 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.