The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Snowball Keep --JForget 23:31, 13 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ptolus[edit]

Ptolus (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Non-notable RPG campaign setting Blowdart | ^talk 16:20, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep and improve Ptolus is notable; the campaign setting has a massive following, including hundreds of forums and communities centered on it. A search for Ptolus generates 245k ghits. This article is lousy, and needs a ton of improvement, however. HatlessAtless (talk) 16:37, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I just spoke with the author on his talk page. I think the rpg articles should be bundled and renommed. Currently the nom is running into issues with WP:JNN, WP:WAX and WP:ALLORNOTHING due to the motivations for deletion. HatlessAtless (talk) 17:41, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep and improve, as Atlas stated, this is notable, though, it just needs improvement.--S_RX 16:43, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep as with the other authors. This is a very well received campaign, and has won a fairly prominent award in its genre (I have changed the article to reflect this). RayAYang (talk) 17:15, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Game-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 20:35, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep award winning, well known. Notable in its area. Hobit (talk) 21:13, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. As noted already, this is award winning and there are a couple of reviews now indicated in the article. --Craw-daddy | T | 23:07, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep: It is a published gaming book by a notable publisher, and in none of his mass RPG AfDs has nom tendered any explanation of why these games are not notable, either in the nominations or anywhere else, other than to say that he "has concerns."  RGTraynor  23:37, 11 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep as per everybody. Award winning game. Edward321 (talk) 01:15, 12 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.