The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Majorly _{(o rly?)} 16:36, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Punzhu puzzles[edit]

Doesn't seem like there's a sufficient assertion of notability for this publishing company. Author correctly points out that Dell Magazines could use more sources, but that company is an offshoot of the well-known major US publisher Dell Publishing. No independent sources given for this one. NawlinWiki 19:19, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

"...a sufficient assertion of notability" might have been addressed in recent changes to article deletion notes. In short, no Internet search (using various terms/phrases) on either firsts mentioned in proposed article resulted in any company or entity other than Punzhu Puzzles. I agree that Dell Magazines is indeed a large and well known U.S. publisher, and through their Wikipedia article you may visit their site to purchase their magazines, but is producing a product for profit (their firsts) more notable than providing various puzzle magazines for free? Or more notable than providing a copyright grant to freely share/copy puzzle magazines with others? I don't know. --Nanaimobar 21:34, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom - Inclusion is not an indicator of notability. — Swpb ^{talk contribs} 21:52, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete unless reliable third party sources are included. Addhoc 15:13, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.