The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete due to the lack of significant coverage in reliable sources to establish notability. No prejudice to recreation if someone can find such coverage on paper or elsewhere. Davewild (talk) 16:58, 15 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Radio Elenore[edit]

Radio Elenore (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Very non-notable pirate; 10 Google hits! Rapido (talk) 14:01, 5 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• KEEP Perfectly notable pirate in its period of significance. As that pre-dated popular use of teh intawebs by 15 years, counting web hits is (perhaps sadly so) not a good way to measure notability of the pirate stations of this era. Andy Dingley (talk) 18:08, 5 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Strong delete Again, another non-notable radio station. The citations in the article are to personal websites or fansites, which fail WP:RS. Ohconfucius (talk) 04:31, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment Of course, online references are easier for WP editors to check, but it would nevertheless be acceptable if sourced from paper references. Ohconfucius (talk) 04:06, 10 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - lack of media coverage. PhilKnight (talk) 12:43, 15 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.