The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- RoySmith (talk) 02:16, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Rafael Serrano (cyclist)[edit]

Rafael Serrano (cyclist) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject—a cyclist—doesn't seem to meet any of the criteria at WP:NCYCLING. For general notability, the only published sources I can find fall under WP:ROUTINE. —  Rebbing  talk  16:11, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

How do you reconcile that with the guideline for male cyclists? It seems to me that if riding for a professional continental team was, by itself, sufficient to satisfy notability (as you say it is), the criteria would include that—but they don't. (Of course, there are exceptions to the guidelines, but I don't think this is an exceptional case.) —  Rebbing  talk  23:51, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Also, I see he participated in a category 1.1 race, which, had he won, would have satisfied notability—but he didn't. —  Rebbing  talk  23:51, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Competed in various 2.HC races (such as the Vuelta a Burgos and the E3 Prijs Vlaanderen before it was promoted), which is the second tier of professional cycling, but never at the top tier. No wins at professional level. Relentlessly (talk) 10:35, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:53, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Cycling-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:53, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.