- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. czar 21:14, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Raine chawla[edit]
- Raine chawla (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No significant coverage in reliable sources and no evidence of satisfying WP:NACTOR. GSS (talk|c|em) 17:29, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. GSS (talk|c|em) 17:30, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. GSS (talk|c|em) 17:30, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 18:48, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ad Orientem (talk) 00:17, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, TheSandDoctor Talk 07:38, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Fails both WP:GNG for lack of significant coverage in reliable sources (was able to find nothing) and WP:NACTOR for lack of multiple significant roles. Jovanmilic97 (talk) 13:25, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.