The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. – Juliancolton | ^Talk 03:41, 28 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Rajat Maurya[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

URLs used for References are bare URLs and there's no importance of the article. The Page creator is creating pages by submitting invalid URLs to confuse the Wikipedia. So I'm requesting to delete these kind of pages from Wikipedia. Josu4u (talk) 21:29, 20 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Strong delete. See my comments at the similar AFD for an article by the same creator. Links to Times of India, Deccan Chronicle, and The Hindu had the potential to establish notability, but instead, the linked articles universally fail to mention the named subject whatsoever. I'm unable to reach any conclusion except reference abuse. 21:59, 20 August 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89 (T·E·C) 02:59, 21 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89 (T·E·C) 02:59, 21 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete for now as there's not much to suggest solid notability or even better sources for that matter. SwisterTwister talk 07:08, 21 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.