The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy deleted -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 12:50, 9 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Rajesh rairala[edit]

Rajesh rairala (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Only claim to notability is the inclusion of the word "famous", without any substantiation. The use of that term is the only thing that made me hesitate to A7 it, as it is an assertion of notability. Vianello (talk) 07:09, 9 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete "Famous" dancers, who end up having a routine career in the computer industry, and no performance credits, are as a rule not actually notable as dancers. DGG (talk) 09:58, 9 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete NOW - I've added the A7. Cross checking article name against author name - it's blatant self publicity. Bazj (talk) 10:09, 9 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• I've deleted it, the word famous was somewhat undermined by later parts of the cv. ϢereSpielChequers 12:21, 9 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.