The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Rajkumarbarathi[edit]

The result was SPEEDY DELETED by Athaenara (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA). postdlf (talk) 19:30, 4 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Author removed prod, original prod said "No references to establish notability". Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 09:19, 4 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: No references to establish notability, google news search does not help. --Omarcheeseboro (talk) 09:22, 4 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete In fact I think it should really be a speedy delete. There is no credible claim of importance. "The music composer of the year from the APAC" might at a glance look like a claim of significance, but what is "the APAC"? A Google search for APAC gives as its first hit APAC Packaging Ltd Gifts and Sundries, Trade only website, as its second APAC - Play Therapy Training Programme, as its third the Wikipedia article for Asia-Pacific, as its fourth the Wikipedia article for a town in Uganda called "Apac", and so it goes on. Nowhere do I find anything that could be the "APAC" referred to in this article, so if it is true it does not look very notable. A Google search for Rajkumarbarathi APAC gives this Wikipedia article and nothing else. Various other searches for Rajkumarbarathi plus other selected relevant words (eg Rajkumarbarathi Trichy or Rajkumarbarathi Tiruchirapalli) also produce nothing but this Wikipedia article. The article looks to me like a hoax, and if it isn't then it is about a totally non-notable subject. JamesBWatson (talk) 10:20, 4 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.